Michelle Cohen, writing an opinion piece for the CBC, asks why under Canadian law naturopaths can present their credentials to the public the way that they do. The answer, she responds, is that various government regulators don't step in to enforce rules against the language in naturopathic advertising. She notes that a recent survey that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick shows that 41 percent of NB's naturopaths uses terms to describe themselves that only licensed traditional medical practitioners may use under law. The link in her piece takes you to a paywalled site. However, here's more about the clash between NB naturopaths and those who say their training is not the same as that of traditional health care professionals. And here's a link to a 2017 article about a University of Alberta study concerning naturopath rejection of vaccination.
More about the clash between traditionally trained Canadian physicians and naturopaths in this article from HuffPost Canada by Natalie Stechyson. Vancouver physician Jon Hislop began tweeting about his concerns about naturopathic medical treatment in February of this year.
More about the status of CAM in Canada: a short bibliography.
H. Boon, Regulation of complementary/alternative medicine: A Canadian perspective, 10(1) Complement Ther. Med. 14-9 (March 2002).
Benston McFarland et al., Complementary and alternative medicine use in Canada and the United States, 92(10) Am. J. Public Health 1616-1618 (Oct. 2002).
Lauren Vogel, "Hodge-Podge" regulation of alternative medicine in Canada, 182(12) CMAJ (September 7, 2010).
Recent Comments