Magic in Roman Law II

Another article for the law and magic bibliography. James B. Rives of York University published "Magic in Roman Law: The Reconstruction of a Crime," in 22 Classical Antiquity 313-339 (October 2003). Here is the abstract.

In this paper I reconsider the Roman law on magic through an examination of three key "moments": the Lex Cornelia de sicariis et veneficiis; the trial of Apuleius as known from his Apology; and a passage from The Opinions of Paulus. I argue that the Roman law on magic grounded in the Lex Cornelia gradually shifted from a focus on harmful and uncanny actions to a concern with religious deviance. This shift was already underway at the time of Apuleius' trial, if only on an ad hoc basis, and was firmly established in the formal discourse of Roman law by ca. 300 CE, the date of The Opinions of Paulus. I argue for the importance of retaining "magic" as a heuristic category, since it is the only term fluid enough to function as an inclusive rubric for this shifting set of concerns.

Here's a link to purchase the article. Otherwise, try your local academic library for the print version.

Comments

[INSTITUTO DE DERECHO ROMANO]

"EL RESPETO A LA PALABRA DADA Y LA BUENA FE EN LOS CONTRATOS. En la antigua Roma y en el derecho actual". Tema de la conferencia que pronunciarán los Dres. Alfredo Di Pietro y Bernardo Nespral en el Colegio Público de Abogados de la Capital Federal (Argentina).
Día: Jueves 8 de septiembre de 2011, a las 18 hs.
Lugar: Salón Humberto Podetti. Av. Corrientes 1455, piso 2°, Ciudad de Buenos Aires
Informes e inscripción: (54-11) 4379-8700, int. 452/3/4
Email: infoacademicas@cpacf.org.ar