The Seamless Web: A Blog on Law, Popular Culture and Related Issues

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Other Blogs

  • CLEWS: The Historic True Crime Blog
  • Cocktail Party Physics
  • Counterfeit Chic
  • Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog
  • Ellusionist Blog
  • HogwartsProfessor.com
  • Law & Humanities Blog
    Law and Humanities Institute Blog
  • LawCulture
  • Lowering the Bar
  • Magic Unlimited With Ellis and Webster
  • Medical Humanities
  • Neuroethics and Law Blog
  • NuT
  • PodBlack Blog
  • Religion Clause
  • Science and Religion Today
  • ScienceBlogs
  • SkepticBlog
  • Swallowing the Camel
  • That's What She Said
  • The Science of Magic
  • The Seamless Web
  • The Yin Blog
    The Yin Blog

Educational Musical Science Videos

Top science/educational videos here. Very amusing (and did I say educational)?

November 06, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Hollywood Tries To Get the Science Right

From Forbes.com, The Science Behind "Watchmen."

September 23, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

One-Way To Mars?

Interesting op/ed from Lawrence Krauss, author of The Physics of Star Trek and professor at Arizona State University. He suggests that we become unsentimental about space travel and exploration. Why not send astronauts one-way to Mars?

September 01, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

The Hunting of the Snarky

Finally, a piece on overused words. The Words You Love to Hate is fun to read--even more fun are the comments. A lot of readers volunteered their pet peeves and I agreed with nearly all of them, although I have to admit that I was surprised that my all time pettest peeve, "awesome," took a while to show up in the list. "Awesome" does not apply unless one is looking at the Milky Way, which is difficult these days unless one is out in the desert away from light pollution, or visiting the Grand Canyon, or contemplating the reach of the Pacific Ocean, or something else on such a grand scale. A new party dress, a visit to McDonald's, or even my agreement to meet with a student on Friday morning, flattering as it was for him to say so, none of these are "awesome."

Some of my other peeves were there as well: "absolutely," "like," (as in "he was, like, there, and I, like, said,") "you know," "dude," (used to be cute but is now not unless the dude is under twelve). I am also sick and tired (and "sick" is also an overused word)  of words such as "sexy". That one gets used on shows such as "What Not To Wear" so much. Sexy this. Sexy that. The hosts on WNTW overuse other words--they have an entire list of words they use on every episode I've seen. It's as if they have approved vocabulary words and they never stray. "Great little jacket." "Great peep toe shoe." And with the reveal: "Shut up!" (from the female host. Why? Did the client say something objectionable? Usually she's remarkably quiet after a week of being treated like a squashed cabbage leaf). "Sexy little cami." ENOUGH. The references to "sexy" really get on my nerves. I consider it vulgar and I wish it would stop. If I'm listening to a tv host giving advice on makeovers, I don't want to hear body parts referred to as butts, boobs, or the girls. And at the end of a lot of episodes, I see preening, dancing, and kisses being blown to the camera from the Client of the Week (CW), this all signifying how happy CW is with her makeover. That kind of behavior is all right, I suppose, and necessary for PR. But I'm expecting advice, which usually comes, and I'm expecting the same kind of respect for the English language, which usually does not.  But respect IS one of the aims of the show, correct?  Whatever happened to Tim Gunn's show? That man is elegance personified.

August 23, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Ally McBeal Fans...

The wait seems to be over. Region 1 DVDs of the complete set of Ally McBeal will apparently be available this fall. Amazon is now taking orders.

July 07, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Law & Order To Return To the UK

Law & Order UK is returning to British tv screens in 2010. The show is part of the Dick Wolf stable of L&O franchises. Read more here.

June 25, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Will We See Ally Mc Beal on DVD After All?

Amazon is taking pre-orders for the first season of Ally McBeal. It seems those pesky music licensing issues might have been solved. Note that Amazon is also taking orders for the full set of Ally, region 2, but the U.S. is region 1, so those discs are not playable on garden variety U.S. equipment.

June 21, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Frolics and Detours

From the Blog of Legal Times: coverage of the Battle of the Law Firms Bands here.

June 19, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Ah...Perry Mason

The latest set of Perry Mason DVDs is out (Volume 4 season 1) and as usual, they're a great deal of fun. Perry (Raymond Burr) and his colleagues Della Street (Barbara Hale) and Paul Drake (William Hopper) solve mysteries a plenty for Perry's clients. While the question is not whether Perry's clients are guilty (with one exception, in this batch the answer is always "no"), it's who actually did the deed. Perry is never faced with having to face representing a guilty client. In the one ugly case represented in this set in which the client is guilty, that individual admits his guilt in the case and in another, and Perry is "off the hook." If this series stands for anything, it stands for justice.

As usual, each episode has its iconic moments: the guilty individual admits guilt, usually in the courtroom, either on the stand, or elsewhere, because of Perry's steeltrap mind and questioning. The D.A., notably not Hamilton Burger (William Talman) in these episodes, but his associates (maybe he's tired of having to lose personally to Perry?) tries hard to put on a good case but always has a losing cause. The police, represented by the wonderful Ray Collins, do their investigation and arrest Perry's client and then Ray, playing Lt. Tragg, takes the stand and answers honestly and without bias. One wonders if sometimes Tragg wishes he could work for the Drake Detective Agency, if only to be on the winning side in a Perry Mason case. Still, when Mason's not at the defense table, he and Burger probably do all right.

Ultimately, the series provides lasting entertainment because of its message. Perry and his friends, Burger, Tragg, and the judges (some of whom appear several times throughout) represent the best of the legal system. They work hard to make certain that the right person is convicted. Even when Perry tries his "tricks" as the prosecution often says, the DA will often also mention that he (and it's always a "he") has no objection as long as justice is served. He's interested in justice, not in getting a conviction, he points out. That's as it should be. For his part, Perry tries his "tricks" in the interests of his clients. He may send a woman who looks like his client out to test the memory of a witness, but he never actually says they are the same person. The point is not to lie. The point is to test the limits of the system. Erle Stanley Gardner knew what he was doing and so did the creators of this series.

For more about Perry Mason, see Francis Nevins' essay about the show in the new book published by the ABA, Lawyers in Your Living Room! (full disclosure: my essay on the show Damages is also in this publication).

June 14, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Poisoning the Field

What a great idea for a law review article. David S. Caudill, Villanova University School of Law, has published "Arsenic and Old Chemistry: Images of Mad Alchemists, Experts Attacking Experts, and the Crisis in Forensic Science," in volume 15 of Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law (2009). Here is the abstract. 

Drawing on research into the use of experts in early 19th-century criminal trials, the image of mad alchemists in popular culture representations of science, and the distinction between empirical and contingent "interpretive repertoires" in the discourse of scientific controversies, this article explores the controversy over arsenic-detection technologies prior to the Marsh test. In addition to noting the predictable criticism of incompetent expertise in the service of law, this article highlights implied accusations of hubris and amorality on the part of over-confident experts, both in the early 19th-century and in today's crisis of forensic science.

Download the article from SSRN here.

June 12, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

»

About

Recent Posts

  • Educational Musical Science Videos
  • Hollywood Tries To Get the Science Right
  • One-Way To Mars?
  • The Hunting of the Snarky
  • Ally McBeal Fans...
  • Law & Order To Return To the UK
  • Will We See Ally Mc Beal on DVD After All?
  • Frolics and Detours
  • Ah...Perry Mason
  • Poisoning the Field
Blog powered by TypePad

Archives

  • November 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009