Check out this piece from Vice on the Association of Nigerian Witches and Wizards (WIZTAN), which is fighting back against Boko Haram. According to reporter Mark Hay, WIZTAN has made some predictions about ultimate success against Boko Haram, the group known for abduction of schoolgirls and for attacks on the Nigerian government. These predictions include the capture of the group's leader by the end of 2014 and (it looks like WIZTAN is hedging its bets a little here) that not all the abducted schoolgirls will be freed and returned to their families.
In the New York Times, a long article about the career and opinions of James "The Amazing" Randi. Adam Higginbotham discusses not just Randi's work but lawsuits brought against him by Uri Geller, and recent problems his longtime companion has had with U.S. Immigration.
Another interesting piece on the possibility (or not) that copyright law can protect magicians' intellectual property.
Jenny Small, The Illusion of Copyright Infringement Protection, 12 Chi-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 217 (Summer 2013). Here are the first few paragraphs of the article.
The schism between knowing and seeing may be magic's allure, but when the magician sees a fellow entertainer perform his signature trick, he wants to know that the law affords him protection. Law, like magic, revolves around expectations. Magic defies one's expectations, but law secures them. Yet, in the realm of copyright law, magicians' expectations for protection are unclear.
As a teenager, Raymond Joseph Teller, of Penn & Teller, envisioned an illusion never before seen. He perfected the trick, and it became known as his signature "Shadows." In the trick, a vase with a rose rests upon a stool and its shadow projects onto a wall. Teller, the "murderer," approaches the shadow $=P218 with a knife, and, as he cuts the petals of the shadow, the real rose petals fall. In 1983, after performing the trick for about seven years, Teller submitted it for copyright registration, using a cartoon-like diagram with a description of the setting, characters, and action. In copyrighting his illusion, he attempted to protect his labor without revealing the secret behind the act.
Until 2012, Teller was the only person to have performed this trick. In that year, however, the video "A Rose & Her Shadow" appeared on YouTube. In the video, Gerard Dogge (alias Bakardy of Los Dos de Amberes) used a knife to cut a projected rose's shadow. Dogge allegedly figured out the secret behind Teller's trick and either devised another way to create the illusion or used video editing to make an audience believe that he could perform the trick. Dogge concluded the video with an offer to sell the trick's secret for 2,450 Euros ($ 3,050). After a failed attempt to negotiate with Dogge, Teller sued him for copyright infringement.
Teller's case represents two emerging legal complexities--the struggle to protect the intellectual property of untraditional artistic creations, like magic and the growing difficulty of preventing artistic replication. This case includes many interesting facets such as Dogge's defamation countersuit in Belgium, issues related to moral and derivative rights, a failed negotiation, and a defendant who all but disappeared. The primary focus of this paper, however, is Teller's copyright infringement claim. Part I addresses the current law surrounding copyright protection of magic and the performance arts. Next, Part II lays out the facts of Teller's case. Finally, Part III discusses Teller's likelihood of success considering the case precedent he must overcome.
My friend Jay Dougherty, of Loyola (Los Angeles) Law School, published this post on the Teller copyright infringement decision at the Loyola, Los Angeles, Law School Faculty Law Blog, Summary Judgments. Here's the link.
The U. S. District Court in Nevada has spoken (not from behind the curtain, either). Judge James Mahan stated in a decision handed down March 21 that magician Gerard Dogge had infringed on magician Teller's copyright in the "Shadows" performance. Remember that case? Yes, the wheels of justice do grind exceedingly slowly (and expensively) but they get around to business eventually. Judge Mahan found that, contrary to the defendant's assertions, the Copyright Act protects dramatic performances as well as pantomines. What's going to the jury? The damages claim: a jury will decide whether Mr. Dogge's infringement was willful or not--willful infringement is incredibly more painful, in terms of dollars, to the defendant. Also going to the jury is Teller's unfair competition claim.
The Hollywood Reporter article mentions the Robert Rice copyright litigation against Fox; I discuss a little about magicians and IP law to protect against infringement in earlier posts here and here.